Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/5561
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKulchytska, Olga-
dc.contributor.authorBodnarchuk, M.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-16T18:41:02Z-
dc.date.available2020-04-16T18:41:02Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationKulchytska O. O. What Makes a Good Piece of Poetry: an Attempt at Subjective Analysis / O. O. Kulchytska, M. P. Bodnarchuk // Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University. - 2016. - Vol. 3. - № 4. - P. 100-106.uk_UA
dc.identifier.other10.15330/jpnu.3.4.100-106-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/5561-
dc.description.abstractOne of the factors in the popularity of Michael Swan’s poetry is a unique combination of a comparatively simple form and deep, subtle meanings that even an inexperienced reader cannot but sense. In linguistics, the phenomenon is dubbed implicitness. In Michael Swan’s poetic texts, implicit meanings are generated through the violation of the maxims of the co-operative principle (conversational implicature) and/or through the use of specific techniques: simplicity of outward form, tropes, irony, attention to detail, contrast and opposition, repetition, punch line, the effect of the author’s presence in the text or distancing from the content.uk_UA
dc.language.isoenuk_UA
dc.publisherVasyl Stefanyk Precarpatian National Universityuk_UA
dc.subjectMichael Swanuk_UA
dc.subjectimplicitnessuk_UA
dc.subjectimplicit meaninguk_UA
dc.subjectauthor’s intended meaninguk_UA
dc.titleWhat Makes a Good Piece of Poetry: an Attempt at Subjective Analysisuk_UA
dc.typeArticleuk_UA
Appears in Collections:Vol. 3, № 4

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1853-5043-1-PB.pdf508.86 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.